I just had an epiphany about Lolita omfG
Anyone ever consider that Humbert isn’t a murderer? That there is no Q but rather Humbert invented him as a projected image of everything that he finds disgusting about himself? I mean we already know Humbert is an unreliable narrator and his unreliability is both due to the fact that he is trying to influence the readers perception of him and also due to the fact that he is mentally unstable. However, his mask has dropped at least twice in the book, particularly when he mentions she cried herself to sleep every night and then that short chapter when we see a little of the obsession behind the calm, collected person we are presented with (the one that ends with “Lolita, lolita, lolita, lolita…”)
I mean Q could still be a real person, someone Humbert might have known or heard of. Perhaps Humbert has read about the murder in a newspaper or some shit but he could’ve framed himself to get the retribution he needed?
So what if he knows his guilt and subconsciously seeks punishment but would rather go to prison for having killed Q thaN FOR REALISING HE DESTROYED LO
So what if he knows his guilt and subconsciously seeks punishment but would rather go to prison for having killed Q thaN FOR REALISING HE DESTROYED LO
Posted 9 hours ago with 1 note
from India, with love and respect for all girls and women
(Source: theleastthaticando, via castill-o)
Posted 5 days ago with 3,642 notes
this sphinx looks like a sorority girl after a long night
(Source: clickzis, via rasputin)
Posted 6 days ago with 101,580 notes
Posted 2 weeks ago with 30,698 notes


